What this clause covers
The public contents gives clause 5 four design ideas and one warning. Minimalism is already defined in clause 3 as critical information plus the least extra information needed to be complete. Progressive disclosure is the technique of showing the next useful layer and keeping the rest reachable, and Annex A gives six named ways to do it, in seven subclauses. The four C principles are named but not expanded in the free preview. That gap matters. A team that fills the four Cs from memory, with confident, concise, clear and consistent, may be right or may be inventing a requirement. The honest position is to record the principle as named, keep the team's working definition in a separate note, and check the published text before relying on it.
The headings in this clause
What to put in place before publication
- Write a design principle note for the help that adopts minimalism and progressive disclosure in your own words.
- Record the team's working definition of the four C principles, clearly marked as a working note until the text is public.
- Audit three screens and mark what is shown at first view and what is one layer deeper.
- Set a rule for what must never be hidden behind a disclosure control, such as a safety instruction or a legal notice.
- Give the design review a checklist item for each principle, so the review can fail a screen.
- Keep the principle note short enough that a designer will read it before the design, not after.
Evidence to keep
| Evidence | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| Principles | A one page design principle note with the team's definitions |
| Disclosure | A layer map for each key screen: first view, second view, full text |
| Review | A design review record with a pass or fail for each principle |
| Working note | A dated note that marks the four C definitions as unverified |
The test a reviewer runs
- Can a designer say what the first view of a screen must contain?
- Is anything essential hidden behind a disclosure control?
- Is the four C note labelled as a working definition rather than a quotation?
- Has a reviewer looked at the help on the smallest supported screen?
Where teams usually fall short
- Progressive disclosure becomes a reason to hide the help that users need most.
- The four Cs are quoted from a blog as if the standard said them.
- Minimalism is read as fewer words, so the help loses a step that the task needs.
What happens next
The FDIS text is the first place the four C elements can be read. Put a task in the plan to update the principle note on the day the text is available, before the next design sprint.
Source
ISO Online Browsing Platform, free preview of ISO/IEC/IEEE DIS 26517 https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso-iec-ieee:26517:dis:ed-1:v1:en read 21 October 2026
ISO/IEC/IEEE DIS 26517, standard record 87297 https://www.iso.org/standard/87297.html read 21 October 2026