26517ISO 26517 Revision CheckerDIS edition 1 · stage 40.60

Home / The record / Clause 5: Design principles

ISO/IEC/IEEE DIS 26517, Clause 5 · Headings only

5 Design principles

Clause 5 fixes the design stance: minimalism, four named C principles whose elements the preview does not state, and progressive disclosure.

What this clause covers

The public contents gives clause 5 four design ideas and one warning. Minimalism is already defined in clause 3 as critical information plus the least extra information needed to be complete. Progressive disclosure is the technique of showing the next useful layer and keeping the rest reachable, and Annex A gives six named ways to do it, in seven subclauses. The four C principles are named but not expanded in the free preview. That gap matters. A team that fills the four Cs from memory, with confident, concise, clear and consistent, may be right or may be inventing a requirement. The honest position is to record the principle as named, keep the team's working definition in a separate note, and check the published text before relying on it.

The headings in this clause

What to put in place before publication

  1. Write a design principle note for the help that adopts minimalism and progressive disclosure in your own words.
  2. Record the team's working definition of the four C principles, clearly marked as a working note until the text is public.
  3. Audit three screens and mark what is shown at first view and what is one layer deeper.
  4. Set a rule for what must never be hidden behind a disclosure control, such as a safety instruction or a legal notice.
  5. Give the design review a checklist item for each principle, so the review can fail a screen.
  6. Keep the principle note short enough that a designer will read it before the design, not after.

Evidence to keep

EvidenceWhat it looks like
PrinciplesA one page design principle note with the team's definitions
DisclosureA layer map for each key screen: first view, second view, full text
ReviewA design review record with a pass or fail for each principle
Working noteA dated note that marks the four C definitions as unverified

The test a reviewer runs

  • Can a designer say what the first view of a screen must contain?
  • Is anything essential hidden behind a disclosure control?
  • Is the four C note labelled as a working definition rather than a quotation?
  • Has a reviewer looked at the help on the smallest supported screen?

Where teams usually fall short

  • Progressive disclosure becomes a reason to hide the help that users need most.
  • The four Cs are quoted from a blog as if the standard said them.
  • Minimalism is read as fewer words, so the help loses a step that the task needs.

What happens next

The FDIS text is the first place the four C elements can be read. Put a task in the plan to update the principle note on the day the text is available, before the next design sprint.

Source

ISO Online Browsing Platform, free preview of ISO/IEC/IEEE DIS 26517 https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso-iec-ieee:26517:dis:ed-1:v1:en read 21 October 2026

ISO/IEC/IEEE DIS 26517, standard record 87297 https://www.iso.org/standard/87297.html read 21 October 2026

The rules this is built from

Read from the real rules, not invented.

This page is read from the public record for clause 5: the heading in the free contents, and where public, the text the preview carries.

  • 80 headings and defined terms
  • 12 dated stages behind the draft
  • 26514:2022 named as the normative reference
  • Check any line yourself
Nothing here is guessed while you wait. Each answer is written from the public record and points to the exact page it came from. Record updated 21 October 2026